Legal Opinion

Alameda County Social Services Agency v. Tammy D.

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 14, 2000No. A086822PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PARRILLI, J.

Here we consider an issue that often arises when a juvenile dependency proceeding reaches the stage at which a permanent plan must be selected for an adoptable child. If a parent has maintained a good relationship with the child through visitation, is that a reason to select a plan less permanent than adoption? This court has interpreted a former statute governing permanency planning as requiring the juvenile court to find the child would not benefit from continuing the parental relationship before it orders the termination of parental rights and places the child for…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In Re Stephanie M.California Supreme Court · 1994
  2. In Re Marilyn HCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Shamblin v. BrattainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Cynthia D. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  5. In Re Zacharia D.California Supreme Court · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Santa Clara County Department of Family & Children's Services v. C.K.California Court of Appeal · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API