Rossaki v. NUS Corp.
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
EYLER, Judge.
The question of first impression presented by this case is whether § 4-409 of Md.Code, Env. art. (1996 RepLVol.) creates a private cause of action for contamination of property. The trial court held that the statute did not create a private cause of action and dismissed appellants’ claim. While we do not reach the issue of whether § 4-409 creates a private cause of action applicable in certain circumstances, we will affirm the trial court’s judgment because § 4-409 does not create a private cause of action on behalf of buyers of real property against sellers or prior occupiers of…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Gross v. Sussex Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
- Rosenblatt v. Exxon Co., U.S.A.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
- Council of Co-Owners Atlantis Condominium, Inc. v. Whiting-Turner Contracting Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
- Shapiro v. MassengillCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1995
- Hrehorovich v. Harbor Hospital Center, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1992
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Fioretti v. Maryland State Board of Dental ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
- Tavakoli-Nouri v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Sherwin-Williams Co. v. Artra Group, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2001
- Heritage Harbour, L.L.C. v. John J. Reynolds, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2002
- Higginbotham v. Public Service CommissionCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2006
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.