Legal Opinion

Rossaki v. NUS Corp.

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 19, 1997No. 1155, Sept. Term, 1996PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EYLER, Judge.

The question of first impression presented by this case is whether § 4-409 of Md.Code, Env. art. (1996 RepLVol.) creates a private cause of action for contamination of property. The trial court held that the statute did not create a private cause of action and dismissed appellants’ claim. While we do not reach the issue of whether § 4-409 creates a private cause of action applicable in certain circumstances, we will affirm the trial court’s judgment because § 4-409 does not create a private cause of action on behalf of buyers of real property against sellers or prior occupiers of…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Gross v. Sussex Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  2. Rosenblatt v. Exxon Co., U.S.A.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  3. Council of Co-Owners Atlantis Condominium, Inc. v. Whiting-Turner Contracting Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  4. Shapiro v. MassengillCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  5. Hrehorovich v. Harbor Hospital Center, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1992

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Fioretti v. Maryland State Board of Dental ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  2. Tavakoli-Nouri v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  3. Sherwin-Williams Co. v. Artra Group, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2001
  4. Heritage Harbour, L.L.C. v. John J. Reynolds, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  5. Higginbotham v. Public Service CommissionCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2006

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API