Tatro v. Brower
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Berrien; Coolidge, J. Assumpsit by Louis N. Tatro against Jacob Brower for breach of warranty. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.
This is an action of assumpsit upon an express warranty in the sale of certain storage tanks by defendant to plaintiff. The tanks were purchased by plaintiff for the purpose of storing cider in them. This purpose was known to defendant. There was conflict in the testimony as to the fact of warranty. The jury found with the plaintiff. The plaintiff’s testimony on the subject of damages tended to show that, after the tanks were furnished, he caused one of them to be filled with cider, and, when this tank was nearly filled, the lug on the lower hoop of the empty tank broke. Plaintiff sent word…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Dushane v. BenedictSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Carter v. GlassMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
3Cited by6 opinions
- American Oil Pump & Tank Co. v. FoustOregon Supreme Court · 1929
- C. H. Dean Co. v. StandiferCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1904
- Michigan Mutual Liability Insurance v. Fruehauf Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1975
- Budd v. MutchlerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
- Burchy v. CarpenterMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.