Legal Opinion
Barton & Pittinos, Inc. v. SmithKline Beecham Corp.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided September 30, 1996No. Civil Action 95-6619PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND MEMORANDUM
KATZ, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 30th day of Sept., 1996, upon consideration of defendant SmithKline Beecham Corporation’s Motion for Summary Judgment, the response thereto, the accompanying legal memoranda, and a hearing, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion is' GRANTED as to Count I of the complaint, and that Counts II, III, and IV are DISMISSED without prejudice.
Plaintiff Barton & Pittinos, Inc. (“B & P”) is a Pennsylvania corporation that offers telemarketing services to the pharmaceutical industry. Defendant SmithKline Beecham Corporation (“SKB”) is a…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Holmes v. Securities Investor Protection CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Illinois Brick Co. v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Barton & Pittinos, Inc. v. Smithkline Beecham CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Barton & Pittinos v. SmithKline BeechamCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997