Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Joplin National Bank

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 5, 1914PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Jasper County Circuit Court, Division Number One — Hon. Joseph D. Perkins, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtRobertson, P. J.

Plaintiff’s petition charges that defendant knowingly took, received, reserved and .charged a greater rate of interest on a loan made to bim by defendant than it was allowed or permitted to take, receive, reserve or charge under sections 7179 and 7198 of the Revised Statutes of the United States (5 Fed. Stat. Ann., pp. 130 and 133), amounting to $809.49, and asked judgment for double that sum. The defendant answered admitting its corporate existence *484under the laws of the United States, followed by a general denial, a plea of the two years’ limitation found in said section 7198 and that if any…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Schuyler National Bank v. GadsdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  2. Citizens' Nat. Bank of Kansas City v. DonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  3. Columbia Water Power Co. v. Columbia Electric Street Railway Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1899
  4. Citizens' National Bank v. DonnellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1903
  5. State ex rel. Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1899

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Mitchell v. Joplin National BankMissouri Court of Appeals · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API