Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Joplin National Bank

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 25, 1918PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Jasper County Circuit Court. — Hon. Joseph D. Perliins, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtBradley, J.

— This is an action to recover double the amount of interest paid to defendant, a national bank. The petition charges usury, and is based upon sections 5197 and 5198, United States Compiled Statutes, 1901. [Sections, 9758 and 9759, United States Compiled Statutes, 1916.] Plaintiff recovered below upon trial before the court without the intervention of a jury, and defendant appealed to this court. This court transferred the cause to the Supreme Court on the theory that jurisdiction was there (Mitchell v. *245National Bank, 184 Mo. App. 483, 170 S. W. 674.); but the Supreme Court retransferred the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Driesbach v. National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. Haseltine v. Central Bank of SpringfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  3. Schuyler National Bank v. GadsdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  4. Citizens' National Bank v. DonnellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1903
  5. Porter v. WoodsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1897

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bowden v. GabelMontana Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Ellis Nat. Bank of Tallahassee v. DavisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API