Legal Opinion

Felix v. Warden, FCI Danbury

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided May 9, 2025No. 3:25-cv-00605Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT DANIEL FELIX, Petitioner, v. No. 3:25-cv-605 (VAB) WARDEN, FCI DANBURY, Respondent. RULING AND ORDER ON MOTION FOR EX PARTE TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER Daniel Felix (“Petitioner”) has filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C § 2241. Petition For Writ of Habeas Corpus, ECF No. 1 (Apr. 14, 2025) (“Petition”). Mr. Felix has moved for an ex parte temporary restraining order (“TRO”) and/or a preliminary injunction to enjoin FCI Danbury from implementing an April 1, 2025 policy capping Residential Reentry Center (“RRC”)…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. O'Lone v. Estate of ShabazzSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Granny Goose Foods, Inc. v. Brotherhood of Teamsters & Auto Truck Drivers, Local No. 70Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Glossip v. GrossSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  4. Carlos Pelaez-Edison Carmona v. United States Bureau of PrisonsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
  5. Wali v. CoughlinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API