Legal Opinion

Bean v. Ford

California Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 2004No. S105508PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WERDEGAR, J.

Terrold Bean claims the right to inherit the intestate estate of Arthur Patrick Ford as Ford’s equitably adopted son. The superior court denied the claim, and the Court of Appeal affirmed the denial, for lack of clear and convincing evidence that Ford intended to adopt Bean. After reviewing California case law on equitable adoption, we conclude that no equitable adoption is shown unless the parties’ conduct and statements clearly and convincingly demonstrate an intent to adopt. We will therefore affirm the judgment of the Court of Appeal.

Factual and Procedural Background

Bom…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Cavanaugh v. DavisTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Estate of GriswoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Jones v. GuyTexas Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Estate of RadovichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Weiner v. FleischmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re Estate of FordCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API