Legal Opinion

Aschliman v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided April 14, 1992No. 90S04-9204-CR-272PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON PETITION FOR TRANSFER

KRAHULIK, Justice.

This matter is before us on Aschliman's Petition for Transfer from the Court of Appeals' affirmance of his conviction for theft and the finding that he was an habitual offender. Aschliman v. State (1991), Ind.App., 578 N.E.2d 759. The only issue Aschliman raises in his petition is whether the trial court erred in refusing his tendered instruction on criminal conversion as a lesser-included offense of theft. Because we conclude that he was entitled to such an instruction, we grant transfer and order a new trial.

The facts relevant here are set out by…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lynch v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Chanley v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Avance v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Zavesky v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Aschliman v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Fisher v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Wright v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Wright v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. Meriweather v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Lahr v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API