Legal Opinion

Schneider v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 1898PublishedCited by 27 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Winnebago county: Geo. W. Burnell, Circuit Judge. The facts in the case appear in the opinion. They argued, inter alia, that negligence could not be conclusively established by a state of facts upon which fair-minded men may differ.

Read the full summary

Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Winnebago county: Geo. W. Burnell, Circuit Judge. The facts in the case appear in the opinion. They argued, inter alia, that negligence could not be conclusively established by a state of facts upon which fair-minded men may differ. Buame v. C. dé N. W. R. Co. 72 Wis. 523; Hooker v. C., M. dé St. P. R. Co. 76 id. 548; Hill v. Fond du Lae,-56 id. 246;' Ea/ples v. Orth, 61 id. 533; Ferguson v. W. C. R. Co. 63 id. 152; Siegel v. M. dé N. R. Co. 79 id. 405; Langhoff v. M. dé P. du C. R. Co. 19 id. 497; Valin v. M. dé H. R. Co. 82 id. 6; Huntress v.…

1Opinion of the CourtCassoday, C. J.

This action is to recover damages sustained by the plaintiff, November 26, 1895, while driving a milk wagon on Ninth street, across the defendant’s main track, about a mile anda quarter southwesterly from the defendant’s depot in Oshkosh. Issue being joined and. trial had, the jury returned a special verdict to the effect (1) that the defendant was guilty of negligence which was the proximate cause of the plaintiff’s injury; (2) that the plaintiff was not guilty of negligence which contributed proximately to the injury; (3) that the plaintiff did stop and look northeasterly along the railroad…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Bright v. Barnett & Record Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Davis v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Deisenrieter v. Kraus-Merkel Malting Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Curry v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1878
  5. Langhoff v. Milwaukee & Prairie du Chien Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1865

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Berkovitz v. American River Gravel Co.California Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Mauch v. City of HartfordWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Stafford v. Chippewa Valley Electric RailroadWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Cawley v. La Crosse City Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Todd v. Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. Ry. Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1915

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API