Legal Opinion

Hammond v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 29, 1925No. 16595PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBroxx.es, C. J.

1. It appearing from a note by the trial judge that he approved certain portions only of the first ground of the amendment to the motion for a new trial, that ground can not be considered by this court. Burdette v. Crawford, 125 Ga. 577 (3) (54 S. E. 677); Franklin County v. Gillespie, 137 Ga. 567 (1) (73 S. E. 833).

2. Grounds 2 to 12 (inclusive) of the amendment to the motion for a new trial (complaining of rulings upon the admissibility of evidence) fail to show any reversible error.

{a) Several of these grounds contain exceptions to the admission of documentary evidence, but these…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Burdette v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  2. Franklin County v. GillespieSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. City of LaGrange v. PoundsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
  2. Jarrett v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
  3. Brown v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1927
  4. Herbert v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API