Legal Opinion

In re Under Armour Securities Litigation

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided January 22, 2020No. 1:17-cv-00388Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT . FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND + Inre UNDER ARMOUR SECURITIES LITIGATION * Civil Action No.: RDB-17-0388 * * x x x -* k x x ** * * zk MEMORANDUM OPINION The central allegation in this putative class action lawsuit is that Defendants Under Armour, Inc. (“Under Armour” or “the Company”) and its teptesentatives, including its former CEO Kevin Plank (“Plank”), misrepresented the level of demand for Under Armour products. In two previous opinions, this Court dismissed Plaintiffs’ claims undet Sections 10(b), 20(a), and 20A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Stoneridge Investment Partners, LLC v. Scientific-Atlanta, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  3. Zucco Partners, LLC v. Digimarc Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  4. Omnicare, Inc. v. Laborers Dist. Council Constr. Industry Pension FundSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  5. United States of America, Charles M. Carberry v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Ron Carey & William HamiltonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API