Legal Opinion
Korotun v. Incorporated Village of Bayville
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 7, 2006PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*312In an action for a judgment declaring that Local Law No. 3 (2001) of the Incorporated Village of Bayville is unconstitutional under the Equal Protection and Due Process Clauses of the United States and New York State Constitutions, the plaintiffs appeal from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Joseph, J), entered July 23, 2004, which granted the motion of the Incorporated Village of Bayville for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and dismissed the complaint.
Ordered that the order and judgment is modified, on the law, by adding a provision thereto…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Lanza v. WagnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1962
- 41 Kew Gardens Road Associates v. TyburskiNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Port Jefferson Health Care Facility v. WingNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
- Miriam Osborn Memorial Home Ass'n v. ChassinNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
3Cited by6 opinions
- Neuman v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
- Terminello v. Village of PiermontAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Meadow E. Assoc. LP v. Village of PotsdamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
- Wilner v. BeddoeNew York Supreme Court · 2011
- Matter of Town of Riverhead v. County of SuffolkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2025
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.