Legal Opinion

United States v. Bethlehem Steel Co.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided August 4, 1966No. 5199PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, Judge

This is an appeal by the United States from the judgment of the United States Customs Court, Second Division, sustaining protests concerning two “midbodies” for freighters. The issue is whether these midbodies are subject to the terms of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, or whether, because of substantive principles of law, the terms of the Tariff Act are inapplicable.

We shall first consider the nature of the midbodies. Appellees introduced the testimony of three witnesses and various exhibits. The court below summed up the evidence as follows:

It appears from the evidence that the midbodies…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. The ConquerorSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Hartranft v. WiegmannSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  3. Norton v. Warner Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. American Net & Twine Co. v. WorthingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  5. The InternationalCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1898

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Buck Kreihs Company, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
  2. Knappton Corp. v. Occupational Safety and Health Review Com'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API