Legal Opinion

Nordahl v. Peterson

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1975No. 443PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDay, J.

The principal question on this appeal is whether the consent of the titleholder and named insured to operate the motor vehicle is implied as a matter of law where the permission to operate the vehicle is from the minor permittee of said titleholder and named insured, when the minor permittee is for all practical purposes the real owner of the vehicle and exercises ownership control over such vehicle. The question involves the interpretation of the omnibus coverage clause, sec. 204.30 (3), Stats. 1 Other questions raised on appeal will be discussed in the opinion.

This is a wrongful death…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Powers v. Allstate InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Boodry v. ByrneWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Krebsbach v. MillerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Prunty v. SchwantesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Derusha v. Iowa National Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Upton v. TatroWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Home Insurance Co. v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1993
  3. LaCount Ex Rel. LaCount v. General Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Peot v. FerraroWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Western Casualty & Surety Co. v. AndersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API