In re Kammerlohr
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Application on the report of official referee^iipon charges against the respondent, an attorney and ccftihkelor at law, for professional misconduct. .
1Opinion of the Court
Clárke, P. J.:
This is the usual proceeding instituted by the Association of the Bar of the City of New York to discipline an attorney.
The respondent was admitted to the bar in April, 1904, and has ever since then practiced as an attorney and counselor at law.
The petition sets forth two specific charges of misconduct. The official referee has reported that the first charge has not been sustained, but that the second has.
As to the first charge,, the petition alleges in substance that in May, 1914, the respondent converted to his own use a diamond ring received on memorandum from Charles Lang &…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Ex Parte WallSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Rochester Bar Association v. . DorthyNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
- In re StantonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
3Cited by2 opinions
- Matter of DolphinNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
- In re MaloneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984