State v. Smith
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
DANIEL E. SCOTT, Chief Judge.
A jury found Codey Smith guilty of robbery and armed criminal action. His appeal is limited to Rule 30.20 plain error claims. 1
Principles of Plain Error Review
“Rule 80.20 is no panacea” for unpreserved error, and does not justify review of all such complaints, but is used sparingly and limited to error that is evident, obvious, and clear. State v. Campbell, 122 S.W.3d 736, 739-40 (Mo.App. 2004). “[N]ot all prejudicial error — that is, reversible error — can be deemed plain error.” State v. Dowell, 25 S.W.3d 594, 606 (Mo.App.2000). A defendant’s Rule 30.20 burden…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. RoperMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
- State v. DowellMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
- State v. CampbellMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
- State v. DrewelMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
- State v. DardenMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. MassaMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
- State v. LaneMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
- State v. PassleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012
- State v. GriffithMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
- State v. JonesMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.