In Re Investigation Into Regulation of Voice Over Internet Protocol (VoIP) Services
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtReiber, C.J.
¶ 1. This appeal concerns whether the Vermont Public Service Board has jurisdiction to regulate interconnected Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) services provided in Vermont. The Board concluded that fixed VoIP is a “telecommunications service” under Vermont law and Vermont regulation of VoIP is not preempted by federal law because intrastate calls can be separately identified. The Board deferred consideration of what type of regulation to impose to a separate phase of the proceeding. On appeal, Comcast Phone of Vermont, LLC 1 argues that the Board erred in not addressing whether…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. De La CuestaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- International Paper Co. v. OuelletteSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United States v. Southwestern Cable Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Petition of Central Vt. Public Service Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1982
- In Re Appeal of Vermont RailwaySupreme Court of Vermont · 2000
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In re Application of Lathrop Limited Partnership I, II and IIISupreme Court of Vermont · 2015
- In re Request for Jurisdictional Opinion re: Changes in Physical Structure and Use at Burlington International Airport for F-35ASupreme Court of Vermont · 2015
- In re Petition of TruConnect Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2021
- In re Lathrop Ltd. Partnership ISupreme Court of Vermont · 2015
- In re Application of Lathrop Limited Partnership I, II and IIISupreme Court of Vermont · 2015
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.