Legal Opinion

Ares v. Aerotek, Inc.

District Court, W.D. Texas

Decided May 9, 2023No. 3:19-cv-00283Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO DIVISION § MICHELLE ARES, § § Plaintiff, § § EP-19-C V-00283-FM § § SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC USA, INC. § d/b/a SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC, § § Defendant. ORDER ON MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES Before the court is “Plaintiff's Motion for Attorney Fees and Costs” [ECF No. 174], filed February 27, 2023, by Michelle Ares (“Plaintiff”), Therein, Plaintiff requests the court grant attorneys’ fees of $1,185,544.00 to be paid by Schneider Electric USA (Defendant) for prevailing in her Title VII sexual harassment claim.! After due consideration of the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  3. Perdue v. Kenny A. ex rel. WinnSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  4. Louisiana Power & Light Co. v. KellstromCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
  5. Walker v. U.S. Department of Housing & Urban DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API