Legal Opinion

S. B. Hicks Motor Co. v. Caldwell

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided November 3, 1920No. 24105PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Action by the S. B. Hicks Motor Company, Incorporated, against Mrs. C. M. Caldwell and others. Judgment- for defendant was affirmed by the Court of Appeal, and plaintiff applies for writ of review.

1Opinion of the CourtMonroe, C. J.

-It appears in this case that J. B. Bailey bought an automobile from relator, in part payment for which he gave four notes of $250 each, indorsed by the defendant Mrs. Caldwell, and secured by a chattel mortgage. Being sued upon the notes, in solido with Bailey, Mrs. Caldwell filed an exception of no cause of action, based upon the ground that she is a married woman, not separate in property from her husband, and without capacity to bind herself by the contract sued on without his authorization. The trial judge maintained the exception, his judgment was affirmed by the Court of Appeal, Second…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Calhoun v. Mechanics' & Traders' BankSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1878
  2. Stothart v. William T. Hardie & Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1903
  3. Hardin v. Wolf & CerfSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1877
  4. Lorio v. GladneySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1920
  5. Bank of Lafayette v. BruffSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1881

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mathews Bros. v. BerniusSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1930
  2. Howard v. CardellaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1931
  3. Honeycutt v. WhittenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1923
  4. Matthews Bros. v. BerniusLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API