Legal Opinion

Doby's Delicatessen Inc. v. Brunkard

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 28, 1994PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—In an action to recover on a series of promissory notes and to set aside a conveyance as fraudulent, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by its brief and oral argument, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Werner, J.), entered March 10, 1992, as denied that branch of its motion which was for summary judgment on its cause of action to recover on certain promissory notes.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, summary judgment is granted to the plaintiff on its cause of action to recover on promissory notes, in the sum of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Great Neck Car Care Center, Inc. v. Artpat Auto Repair Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  2. Ward v. HanleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Nissan Motor Acceptance Corp. v. ScialpiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  2. RVC Associates v. FarkasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API