Legal Opinion
Guadamuz v. Heckler
District Court, N.D. California
Decided October 23, 1986No. C-84-6396 MHPPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PATEL, District Judge.
Plaintiffs originally brought this class action challenging the Secretary of Health and Human Services (“Secretary”) policy of delaying the payment of retroactive benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 401-433 (1983) (“Title II”) until after retroactive benefits under Title XVI of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 1381-1383 (1982) (“Title XVI”) were calculated and paid in “concurrent claims cases” — cases in which the claimant applies for both types of benefits at roughly the same time and the Secretary ultimately awards both types of…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Schweiker v. Gray PanthersSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Herweg v. RaySupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Sidney E. Dawson v. Robert H. Finch, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Guadamuz v. BowenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Guadamuz v. BowenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Pappas v. BowenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- Pappas v. BowenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988