Legal Opinion
Quailes v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided April 14, 1992No. 91-1437CPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NETTESHEIM, Judge.
This case is before the court after argument on cross-motions for summary judgment. The issue is whether plaintiff was *660properly separated from the military for misconduct instead of disability.
FACTS
Monroe Quailes, Jr. (“plaintiff”), appearing pro se, requests disability payments and other benefits, including correction of his military records to show that he suffered and continues to suffer from Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (“PTSD”) and should have been retired at a 100-percent medical disability rating.
Plaintiff enlisted in the United States Army (the “Army”) on…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- David W. Heisig v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Sanders v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
- Pamela Lea Maier v. Verne Orr, Secretary of the Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Hary v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1980
- Merla J. Mullenberg v. United States of America, Department of Health & Human Services, and Dr. Otis Bowen, Secretary of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Champagne v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1996
- Dougharty v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
- Robert L. McGee v. R. James NicholsonUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2006
- Dibble v. FenimoreDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2006
- Monroe Quailes, Jr. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.