Legal Opinion

ELLER v. Work

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 31, 1975No. Appeal, 1111PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Hoffman, J.,

The appellant, plaintiff below, contends that the trial judge committed reversible error in charging the jury on the “choice of paths” doctrine and in allowing the introduction of allegedly inadmissible hearsay testimony.

The minor-appellant, Richard Eller, age thirteen, was walking next to his brother, Frank Eller, Jr,, on Isabel Lane in West Goshen Township, Chester County, at 7:00 p.m., on February 15, 1972. There are no sidewalks on either side of this suburban street and the lawns lead straight to the roadway. Frank Eller testified that he was walking on the lawns…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Dilliplaine v. Lehigh Valley Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Allen v. MackSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  3. Commonwealth v. CheeksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  4. Commonwealth v. ColemanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  5. Cody v. S.K.F. Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. RhodesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. Reichman v. WallachSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Downing v. ShafferSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  4. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Buchakjian v. BuchakjianSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Strother v. BinkeleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API