Legal Opinion
Ochoa v. J.B. Martin & Sons Farms, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 26, 2002No. 00-16290PublishedCited by 54 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TASHIMA, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs-Appellants are 15 migrant farm workers who reside in Arizona who sued Defendant Appellee J.B. Martin and Sons Farms, Inc. (“Martin Farms”), for claims arising under the Agricultural Worker Protection Act (“AWPA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1801-1872 (1999), and Arizona state law. The district court dismissed the action for lack of personal jurisdiction over Martin Farms. Appellants timely appealed, contending that Martin Farms had sufficient contacts with Arizona to assert personal jurisdiction in Arizona. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we reverse.
2Cases cited26 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Lee v. City Of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Data Disc, Incorporated v. Systems Technology Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Ce Distribution, LLC v. New Sensor CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Robin Petersen v. Boeing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Action Embroidery Corp. v. Atlantic Embroidery, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- TPS Utilicom Services, Inc. v. AT & T CORP.District Court, C.D. California · 2002
- Senne v. Kansas City Royals Baseball Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.