Legal Opinion
Ciresi v. Globe & Rutgers Fire Insurance
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided October 14, 1932No. 28,938PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.
Defendant appeals from a judgment entered on a verdict for plaintiff. Plaintiff sues on an insurance policy for the damage resulting from a theft of the insured automobile. There was an appraisal and award of damage pursuant to the policy. In order to recover more, plaintiff had to nullify the award. It was $201, and the verdict $558. So the jury held the award invalid.
There was no motion for a new trial. Hence, on appeal from the judgment, we cannot consider any errors assigned which go only to the trial procedure, the introduction and exclusion of evidence, and the like. Smith v. Gray Motor…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Itasca Paper Co. v. Niagara Fire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
- Hefferen v. Northern Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
- Rossier v. Union Automobile InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1930
- Stoops v. First American Fire InsuranceTennessee Supreme Court · 1930
- Federal Insurance v. HiterCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Co. v. SchaeferTexas Supreme Court · 2003
- Carlton v. Trinity Universal Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2000
- Mork v. Eureka-Security Fire & Marine Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- Culhane v. Western National Mutual Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- Dunmire Motor Co. v. Oregon Mutual Fire InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1941
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.