Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Hirsch v. Weissbrod

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 7, 1942PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtEder, J.

The sole question involved in this habeas corpus pro- ' ceeding is whether the relator is being lawfully confined and detained under valid process; if he is, the writ must be dismissed.

It appears that the relator was arrested by a marshal of the city of New York upon an execution issued against his person by virtue of the recovery of a judgment obtained against the relator in the Municipal Court of the City of New York, after a trial upon the merits, in an action for wages. Such a remedy is permitted by the statute. There was, therefore, jurisdiction of the person and of the subject-matter…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Brown v. J. P. Morgan & Co.New York Supreme Court · 1941
  2. King v. KirbyNew York Supreme Court · 1858
  3. Harmon v. . HopeNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  4. Rapp v. MastenNew York Surrogate's Court · 1879

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cadle Co. v. CalcadorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API