Legal Opinion
Smith v. Café Asia
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided March 23, 2009No. Civil Action No. 07-621 (RWR/JMF)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JOHN M. FACCIOLA, United States Magistrate Judge.
Before me are Plaintiffs Motion to Compel and/or for Sanctions [# 52], Defendant’s Opposition to Plaintiffs Motion to Compel and/or for Sanction (“Def.Opp.”) [# 54], and Plaintiffs Reply to Opposition to Motion to Compel and/or for Sanctions (“Reply”) [# 61]. This case has been referred to me for the purpose of handling discovery.
I. Background.
The facts of this ease are briefly set out in Smith v. Café Asia, 246 F.R.D. 19, 20 (D.D.C.2007). The Court initially ordered that discovery would commence at the conclusion of mediation…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Castaneda v. PartidaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Howard University v. BestDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- Davis v. Coastal International Security, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
- Equal Rights Center v. Post Properties, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2007
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Trustees of the Electrical Workers Local No. 26 Pension Trust Fund v. Trust Fund Advisors, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Tig Insurance Company v. Firemen's Insurance Company of WashingtonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Homesite Insurance Company of the Midwest v. HowellDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2022
- Oppenheimer v. Episcopal Communicators, Inc.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2020
- Smith v. Ergo Solutions, LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.