Legal Opinion

Barlindal v. City of Bonney Lake

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided November 15, 1996No. 20028-7-IIPublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBridgewater, J.

The City of Bonney Lake appeals a superior court judgment ordering the return of firearms to George Barlindal. Barlindal cross-appeals the trial court’s finding that the firearms sustained no appreciable damage while being stored by Bonney Lake. Bonney Lake’s civil forfeiture action followed an unsuccessful, unappealed criminal prosecution by Pierce County wherein evidence seized during the execution of an invalid warrant was suppressed. We hold that Bonney Lake was in privity with Pierce County in the criminal action, and that the doctrine of issue preclusion prevents Bonney Lake from…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. One Assortment of 89 FirearmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Rozner v. City of BellevueWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Hanson v. City of SnohomishWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Owens v. KuroWashington Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Deeter v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Thompson v. Department of LicensingWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Thompson v. State Dept. of LicensingWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State v. BarnesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997
  4. City of Des Moines v. PERSONAL PROPERTY IDENTIFIED AS $81,231 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCYCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997
  5. Espinoza v. City of EverettCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API