Legal Opinion

Queen v. Schmidt

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided December 18, 2015No. Civil Action No. 2010-2017Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA _________________________________________ ) KATRINA QUEEN et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 10-2017 (PLF) ) JANET SCHMIDT et al., ) ) Defendants. ) _________________________________________ ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on defendant Janet Schmidt’s Motion to Quash, Dkt. 62 and the responses of plaintiffs’ counsel Robert Bunn, Dkt. 63 & 71, to the Court’s September 3, 2015 order to show cause why it should not sanction him under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See Dkt. 57…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Touhy v. RagenSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. United States v. Binh Tang VoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
  3. Khouj v. DaruiDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API