Legal Opinion
Khouj v. Darui
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided April 15, 2008No. Misc. No. 07-387 (RCL)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ROYCE C. LAMBERTH, District Judge.
Presently before the Court is Dr. Abdullah M. Khouj’s motion [10] to quash certain Rule 17(c) subpoenas served by defendant Farzad Darui.1 Upon consideration of the motion, *730the opposition and reply thereto, the applicable law, and the record herein, this Court finds that the motion to quash should be DENIED.
I. BACKGROUND
On October 3, 2007, this Court granted Darui’s motion for an order permitting Darui to issue early return subpoenas duces tecum under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 17(c).2 Pursuant to the Court’s Order, Darui issued…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Church of Scientology of California v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United States v. Alex J. RaineriCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- United States v. SegalDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2003
3Cited by4 opinions
- Amobi v. District of Columbia Department of CorrectionsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- United States v. Binh Tang VoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Queen v. SchmidtDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Republic of Djibouti v. Doraleh Container Terminal SaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2023