In Re Keystone Development Corp.
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the Court
¶ 1.
In August of 2006, pursuant to an agreement with the City of Burlington, Keystone Development Corporation provided notice to the City of its intention to excavate a drainage ditch and harvest trees on a property Keystone owns in the City. The City’s zoning administrator informed Keystone, via two administrative notices, that the work required a zoning permit. Keystone did not seek a permit, but instead appealed to the Burlington Development Review Board, and later to the Environmental Court. Both tribunals affirmed, and Keystone lodged this appeal. We deem the appeal moot, and dismiss.
¶…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Smith v. Winhall Planning CommissionSupreme Court of Vermont · 1981
- Winton v. Johnson & Dix Fuel Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1986
- Houston v. Town of WaitsfieldSupreme Court of Vermont · 2007
- Chase v. StateSupreme Court of Vermont · 2008
- In Re RossSupreme Court of Vermont · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- In Re Sisters & Bros. Investment Group, LLPSupreme Court of Vermont · 2009
- Price v. Town of FairleeSupreme Court of Vermont · 2011
- Donald Gould v. Town of MonktonSupreme Court of Vermont · 2016
- In Re Paynter 2-Lot SubdivisionSupreme Court of Vermont · 2010
- In re B&M Realty, LLCSupreme Court of Vermont · 2016
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.