Rousso v. State

¶1 Lee Rousso is an amateur poker enthusiast. He enjoys playing poker in virtual card rooms on the Internet. After the legislature amended the state *348gambling act1 by inserting the words “the internet” in the act’s nonexclusive list of media through which the transmission of “gambling information” is prohibited,2 Rousso sought a declaratory judgment that the amendments impermissibly interfere with Congress’s authority to regulate interstate and international commerce. The superior court entered summary judgment in the State’s favor, and Rousso appeals. Because the State’s established interest…