Minnesota Mining & Mfg. Co. v. Neisner Bros.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
CAMPBELL, District Judge.
The complaint filed herein charges infringement 'by the defendant of United States Patent No. 2,177,627, issued to plaintiff on October 31, 1939, on the application of one Richard Curley Drew, for Adhesive Sheeting. This is the 'basic patent under which the plaintiff manufactures and sells transparent pressure-sensitive adhesive tape, known commercially as “Scotch” Brand Cellophane Tape. The accused tape —-called “Edaplast” Cellophane Tape — is manufactured by Eugen Dahm & Sons, a partnership of Ontario, Canada. Since the manufacturer was located outside the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Minnesota Mining & Mfg. Co. v. International Plastic Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1947
- Minnesota Mining & Mfg. Co. v. Pax Plastics Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1946
- Minnesota Min. & Mfg. Co. v. International Plastic Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1945
3Cited by3 opinions
- Technical Tape Corporation v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
- Technical Tape Corp. v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1956
- Minnesota Mining & Mfg. Co. v. Neisner Bros.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1954