Legal Opinion
Spr. Hill Util Dist v. Cty of Longview
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided October 28, 1982No. 1479PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RAMEY, Justice.
This is a quo warranto action brought by the State of Texas on the relation of the Spring Hill Utility District, Ronald C. Gabriel and Michael C. Duckett (“Spring Hill”), contesting the validity of certain annexation proceedings of the city of Long-view, Texas (“Longview”) a home rule city. The trial court entered judgment declaring annexation Ordinance 1309, which comprised the main body of the water district, valid and the land described therein properly annexed by Longview.
In January 1980 a sufficient number of voting residents of the water district, most of which lay within…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- City of Mason v. West Texas Utilities Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1951
- City of Houston v. State Ex Rel West University PlaceTexas Supreme Court · 1943
- City of West Lake Hills v. Westwood Legal Defense FundCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980
- City of Irving v. CallawayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962
- City of Wichita Falls v. State Ex Rel. VogtsbergerTexas Supreme Court · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- City of Longview v. State Ex Rel. Spring Hill Utility DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1983
- Opinion No., Texas Attorney General Reports1986