Legal Opinion

City of Longview v. State Ex Rel. Spring Hill Utility District

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 13, 1983No. C-1795PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POPE, Chief Justice.

The State of Texas, on relation of Spring Hill Utility District, instituted this quo war-ranto action contesting the validity of ordinances by the City of Longview that annexed the district. The trial court held that the annexation was valid, but the court of appeals held that the annexation was invalid. 642 S.W.2d 544 (1982). We reverse the judgment of the court of appeals and affirm the trial court judgment.

The Spring Hill Utility District is a water control and improvement district consisting of one large tract of land and two smaller tracts located approximately six…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. May v. City of McKinneyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972
  2. Spr. Hill Util Dist v. Cty of LongviewCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. City of Cresson v. City of GranburyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2008
  2. City of Cresson, Texas v. City of Granbury, Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2008
  3. City of Cresson, Texas v. City of Granbury, Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2008
  4. Opinion No., Texas Attorney General Reports1985
  5. Opinion No., Texas Attorney General Reports1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API