Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Brown

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 26, 2008No. 162 MAP 2005PublishedCited by 95 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice SAYLOR.

Appeal was allowed to determine whether the filing of an untimely notice of appeal displaces the statutory one-year period for filing a state post-conviction petition, as suggested by a passage from this Court’s decision in Commonwealth v. Murray, 562 Pa. 1, 753 A.2d 201 (2000).1

Appellant was convicted of possession of a controlled substance, possession with intent to deliver, and criminal conspiracy. In May 2001, the trial court imposed a sentence of incarceration spanning from four to eight years. Appellant secured substitute counsel, who sought to make an oral…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BennettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. Commonwealth v. FahySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  3. Commonwealth v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  4. Commonwealth v. PeterkinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  5. Commonwealth v. MurraySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by95 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. HenkelSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Commonwealth v. EdmistonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  3. Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Burton, S.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  4. Commonwealth v. WattsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  5. Commonwealth v. DotySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012

90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API