Legal Opinion

Lucey v. Meyer

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided March 28, 2012No. 4960PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLockemy, J.

In this civil action involving an employment contract, Justin O’Toole Lucey and Justin O’Toole Lucey, P.A. (Firm) (collectively Appellants) appeal the trial court’s denial of their motion to compel arbitration. Appellants contend the trial court erred in: (1) finding the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) did not apply because the relationship between Firm and Amy Meyer did not involve interstate commerce; (2) finding the arbitration clause was unconscionable; (3) striking the entire arbitration clause when it was more appropriate to sever the alleged unconscionable portion and compel arbitration;…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Allied-Bruce Terminix Cos., Inc. v. DobsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Futch v. McAllister Towing of Georgetown, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  3. Citizens Bank v. Alafabco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2003
  4. Calderon v. Kansas Department of Social & Rehabilitation ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
  5. Zabinski v. Bright Acres AssociatesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Santangelo Law Offices, P.C. v. Touchstone Home Health LLC (In re Touchstone Home Health LLC)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 2017
  2. Beasenburg v. Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical IncDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2023
  3. Clark v. American Multi-Cinema, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2020
  4. Coffey & McKenzie LLC v. Twin City Fire Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2021
  5. Nicole Lampo v. Amedisys Holding, LLCCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API