Legal Opinion

Brookens v. Department of Labor

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 2, 2018No. Civil Action No. 2016-1390Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BENOIT BROOKENS, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 16-1390 (TJK) R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA, Secretary, Department of Labor, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Benoit Brookens worked as an economist for the Department of Labor (“DOL,” sued in this case through Defendant, the Secretary of Labor, in his official capacity). Brookens claims that DOL unlawfully terminated him, alleging that his firing amounted to age- and race- based discrimination and retaliation for his union activity. He litigated those claims before the Merit Systems…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. Pace v. DiGuglielmoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. Holland v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  5. Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API