Legal Opinion
Ramey v. Mudd
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided September 26, 2003No. 02CA14PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Evans, Presiding Judge.
{¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant Nicole Ramey appeals from the judgment of the Gallia County Court of Common Pleas, which granted summary judgment in favor of Gallia County, its sheriff, defendant-appellee David Martin, and the Gallia County Board of Commissioners, defendants-appellees Shirley Angel, Skip Meadows, and Bill Davis.
{¶ 2} Appellant asserts that the trial court erred by not finding appellees liable pursuant to the doctrine of respondeat superior for the acts committed by former sheriffs deputy, defendant Richard Mudd.
{¶ 3} For the reasons that follow, we disagree…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Polk County v. DodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Vahila v. HallOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- Welco Industries, Inc. v. Applied CompaniesOhio Supreme Court · 1993
- David M. Foster v. Lawrence J. Walsh, Clerk, Akron Municipal CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Harris v. SuttonOhio Court of Appeals · 2009
- Kingston Mound Manor I. v. KeetonOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
- Browning v. FostoriaOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
- Mullins v. Liberty Twp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2022
- City of Sharonville v. American Employers InsuranceOhio Court of Appeals · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.