United States v. O'Rourke
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
MOTLEY, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This action is now before the court as the result of a contempt motion made by the plaintiff, United States of America, pursuant to Rule 43 of the Civil Rules of this court. 1 The contempt motion seeks to hold the defendant, Westchester County (the “County”), in contempt for failure to comply with its obligations set forth in the Consent Decree entered by this court in December 1975. For the reasons set forth below, this court grants the motion of the plaintiff, finds the defendant in contempt of the 1975 Consent…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- McComb v. Jacksonville Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Local Number 93, International Ass'n of Firefighters v. City of ClevelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. ITT Continental Baking Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. Armour & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. O'Rourke ex rel. County of WestchesterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- United States v. O'RourkeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991