Legal Opinion
Carozza v. Lusk
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided September 19, 2022No. CA2021-12-155PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[Cite as Carozza v. Lusk,
2022-Ohio-3272.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO BUTLER COUNTY LARRY E. CAROZZA, et al., : Appellees, : CASE NO. CA2021-12-155 : OPINION - vs - 9/19/2022 : JAMES LUSK, et al., : Appellants. : CIVIL APPEAL FROM BUTLER COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS Case No. CV 2020 10 1554 Slater & Zurz, LLP, and Mark A. Ropchock and Richard V. Zurz, Jr., for appellees. Surdyk, Dowd & Turner Co., L.P.A., and Jeffrey C. Turner and David B. Shaver, for appellants. HENDRICKSON, J. {¶ 1} Appellants, James Lusk ("Lusk") and the city of Middletown, Ohio ("City"),…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Anderson v. City of MassillonOhio Supreme Court · 2012
- O'Toole v. DenihanOhio Supreme Court · 2008
- Smith v. McBrideOhio Supreme Court · 2011
- Argabrite v. NeerOhio Supreme Court · 2016
- Lambert v. ClancyOhio Supreme Court · 2010
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Shaw v. Washington Court House City Schools Bd. of Edn.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2022
- Williams v. Shawnee Twp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2023