Legal Opinion

Martin v. Coal Co.

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided January 23, 1912PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error to Circuit Court, Kanawha County. Action by Albert A. Martin, an infant etc., against Hughes Creek -Coal Company. Verdict for plaintiff was set aside by the •Court, and Martin brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Beannon, Judge:

The Hughes Creek Coal Company is a private corporation engaged in Mining Coal, its works being on land owned by it-on the line of the Kanawha & Michigan railroad. As a part of its operating equipment it has tracks ’for receiving empty railroad cars and loading coal, connecting with the said railroad, as a switch track, but on its own land. It had some empty cars standing on its track. The track had a slight down grade from a point *712at the top of the grade called a lmuclde, the point where empty cars stood. One of the company’s employees, in order to take one of these cars from…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dicken v. Liverpool Salt & Coal Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Gunn v. Ohio River R.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Uthermohlen v. Bogg's Run Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Conrad v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Davis v. BakerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. MeansIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
  2. Diotiollavi v. United Pocahontas Coal Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Simmons v. Chesapeake & Ohio Ry. Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Dickinson v. New River etc. Coal Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Wilson v. Union Pacific RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1921

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API