Legal Opinion · Dissent

Schroeder v. Kalenak Painting & Paperhanging, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 17, 2006Published

1Dissent

Gorski and Green, JJ. (dissenting in part).

We respectfully dissent in part. Contrary to the view of the majority, we conclude that Supreme Court erred in granting those parts of the respective motions of defendants for summary judgment dismissing the Labor Law § 240 (1) claim against them, and we further conclude that the court should have granted plaintiffs cross motion for partial summary judgment on liability under Labor Law § 240 (1).

Plaintiff was an independent contractor hired to install wallpaper in the bathroom of an apartment located in a large apartment complex. Plaintiff testified…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Prats v. Port Authority of New York & New JerseyNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. Martinez v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. LaFontaine v. Albany Management, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  4. Loreto v. 376 St. Johns Condominium, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  5. Collins v. ShagerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API