People v. Ellis
Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GOLDSTEIN, P. J.
We find that the People cannot rebut the presumption of a speed trap, which arises whenever radar is used to enforce a prima facie *Supp. 27speed limit, by producing a summary of the current engineering and traffic survey for the pertinent segment of roadway.
Facts
Newport Beach Police Department Officer Burgen used his hand-held radar unit to determine that defendant Neal Barnett Ellis’s speed ranged between 42 and 45 miles per hour as he traveled through a 25-mile-per-hour zone. At trial, Officer Burgen produced a summary of a November 1990 engineering and traffic…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- People v. HalopoffAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1976
- People v. KrissCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- People v. SterrittAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1976
- People v. SterrittCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- People v. DifioreAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.