Legal Opinion

People v. Ellis

Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California

Decided February 14, 1995No. Crim. A. No. 9245Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GOLDSTEIN, P. J.

We find that the People cannot rebut the presumption of a speed trap, which arises whenever radar is used to enforce a prima facie *Supp. 27speed limit, by producing a summary of the current engineering and traffic survey for the pertinent segment of roadway.

Facts

Newport Beach Police Department Officer Burgen used his hand-held radar unit to determine that defendant Neal Barnett Ellis’s speed ranged between 42 and 45 miles per hour as he traveled through a 25-mile-per-hour zone. At trial, Officer Burgen produced a summary of a November 1990 engineering and traffic…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. HalopoffAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1976
  2. People v. KrissCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  3. People v. SterrittAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1976
  4. People v. SterrittCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  5. People v. DifioreAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API