Legal Opinion

Skokut v. MCI

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 10, 1992No. Nos. 712, 713, 714, 715, 716 and 719 C.D. 1991PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PALLADINO, Judge.

Appellants Adam and Mary Louise Skokut, John P. and Amelia R. Stawovy, and Valentine’s Inc. (hereafter, collectively referred to as Landowners) appeal the February 21, 1991 order of the Court of Common Pleas of Westmoreland County (trial court) which sustained the demurrers of Appellee Baltimore and Ohio Railroad (Railroad) and Appellees MCI Telecommunications Corporation, Sonecor Fibercom Corporation t/d/b/a Lightnet, CSX, and Southern New England Telecommunications (hereafter, collectively referred to as telecommunications companies) to Landowners’ second amended petitions…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Jacobs v. Nether Providence TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  2. Harborcreek Township v. RING ET UX.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Condemnation of the Land & Property JacobsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. Lutzko v. Mikris, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  5. Culver v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hill v. City of BethlehemCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. Maurizi v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Ristvey v. Commonwealth, Department of TransportationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  4. C.A. Conley, an Individual v. County of AlleghenyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API