Legal Opinion
United States v. Richard K. Ehrlich and Lurline Gardens Limited Dividend Housing Partnership
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 23, 1981No. 79-3304PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EUGENE A. WRIGHT, Circuit Judge:
I. FACTS
Section 236 of the National Housing Act, 12 U.S.C. § 1715z-l (1976), authorizes the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development to insure mortgages and subsidize interest payments on behalf of the sponsors of low income housing projects. This case involves a project sponsored by Lurline Gardens, a limited partnership. Richard Ehrlich was Lurline’s sole general partner, and was the general contractor for the project.
An insurable mortgage is limited, in a case such as this, to 90% of the replacement costs of the project. Replacement costs include…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. BornsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. Lennard L. MeadCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- United States v. Charles C. Hibbs, and Fairhill Company, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- United States v. WoodburyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
- United States v. Fox Lake State Bank, and Donald AdamsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1966
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- United States of America, Ex Rel. Kreindler & Kreindler, Cross-Appellee v. United Technologies Corporation, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- United States ex rel. Hopper v. AntonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- United States of America, Ex Rel. James M. Hagood v. Sonoma County Water Agency, James M. Hagood v. Sonoma County Water AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Ab-Tech Construction, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1994
- United States v. Incorporated Village of Island ParkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1995
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.