Legal Opinion

Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Hayslett

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided June 9, 1910PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to a judgment of the Circuit Court of Norfolk ■county in an action of assumpsit. Judgment for the plaintiff. Defendant assigns error.

1Opinion of the Court

Keith P.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, on the 26th of February, 1907, received from Joseph Hayslett a written application for insurance, dated on the 20th of that month, and issued its policy to him on the 9th day of the ensuing March for the sum of $500. On the 27th of February, 1908, Hayslett died, and a suit was brought upon the policy, a verdict rendered and a judgment recovered which is before us upon -a writ of error.

The policy contained the following provisions: “It is further declared and agreed that the foregoing statements and answers,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Columbia Accident Ass'n v. RockeySupreme Court of Virginia · 1896
  2. City of Richmond v. LeakerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1900
  3. Oeters v. Supreme Lodge Knights of HonorSupreme Court of Virginia · 1900

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Inter-Ocean Insurance v. HarkraderSupreme Court of Virginia · 1951
  2. Kelly v. SchnellerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1927
  3. Union Indemnity Co. v. DoddCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1927
  4. North River Insurance v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1923
  5. Thomas v. New York Life InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API