Legal Opinion

In Re the Appeal of the Selection Process for the Position of Electrician

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided February 3, 2004No. A03-785PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

G. BARRY ANDERSON, Judge.

In 2002, relator, Keith Anderson, a temporary electrician for the City of Minneapolis, complained of alleged safety violations involving city vehicles. Shortly afterward, relator was terminated from his employment. After the termination, relator complained to the Minnesota Occupational, Safety, and Health Agency (MOSHA). Eight months after relator’s employment was terminated, the city accepted applications for permanent electricians; one of the highlighted requirements was completion of a state-approved apprenticeship. Relator had completed a state-approved…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Reserve Mining Co. v. HerbstSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  2. Hubred v. Control Data Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  3. Cochrane v. Tudor Oaks Condominium ProjectCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
  4. State Ex Rel. Kos v. AdamsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  5. Schiff v. GriffinCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Laymon v. Minnesota Premier Properties, LLCCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API