Legal Opinion

Spannuth v. State

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 28, 1975No. State 49 (1974)PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHanley, J.

Two issues are presented for review:

1. May this sentence be reviewed by writ of error?

2. Was the action of the trial court of imposing restitution in addition to the sentence within the court’s jurisdiction?

Route of appeal.

The defendant in effect appeals from the sentence.

The overall sentence is challenged insofar as it contains the requirement of restitution, orally ordered by the trial court.

We think the proper method of correction is via a sec. 974.06, Stats., motion:

“Post-conviction procedure. (1) A prisoner in custody under sentence of a court claiming the right to be re leased upon the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. GerardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  2. State v. WuenschWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  3. State v. GarnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Gaddis v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Babbitt v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. DavisTennessee Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Garski v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  3. State v. RadkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
  4. State v. LynchCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1981
  5. State v. MeyerCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1989

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API